do you ever catch yourself blamin casino and then feel a bit stupid about it

K

Kroffe

New member
Messages
9
Reaction score
14
Points
3
ok so this is a bit embarrassing to admit. was playing diamond cats last night, down about 60 quid, and i found myself opening a new tab to look up whether amatic had recently changed their rng settings. spent about 15 min readin reddit threads about it
then i caught myself. i had just lost 60 quid on a slot that never paid me well and that i have been playing anyway for two years because i quote "like the feel of it". i have no one to blame but the guy who keeps opening diamond cats

does anyone else do this or is it just me?? casino-blaming thing
 
ngl yeah obviously but thats not alwayz just cope tho
 
Last edited:
look theres a difference when its ACTUALLY rigged tho and not just variance. like the crazy time thing i documented in another thread. 847 spins, consistant directional bias, i have timestamps and everything. thats not sore loser stuff thats data. but yeah for diamond cats specifically its probably variance
probably
PROBABLY
well who knows
 
What you're describing is self-serving bias. Wins get attributed to skill or to luck working in our favour. Losses get attributed to external causes. It's documented across most decision-making contexts - gambling just has a convenient specific target to point at.

The harder part to sit with is that the bias feels entirely rational from inside it. You genuinely believe the external explanation in the moment. That's what makes it stick.
 
bill_collins said:
What you're describing is self-serving bias.
Click to expand...
yeah that's the word i was reaching for. self serving. my brain needed an explanation that wasn't "you chose to open diamond cats again for the thousandth time" so it started building a case against Amatic specifically
 
my bf does this after every bad session without fail.ends up on youtube looking at evidence videos, spending an hour building a case against whatever game he just lost on. what I notice is he never goes lookin for evidence when he wins. wins don't need explaining apparently
 
that's sort of exactly the point i was making
 
had a whole argument with bet365 support last month over a slot session. went through every spin trying to prove something. they sent me the rng certificate. i don't even know what an rng certificate IS but i demanded it anyway so they sent it. read the whole thing. still felt like they owed me something. still do actually..
 
worth noting there's a version of this that's legitimate though. some casinos do set lower rtp on certain games. some platforms offer worse slot versions than others. the problem is the feeling of "something's wrong here" gets triggered by normal variance AND by actual manipulation, and most of the time it's variance. figuring out which in the moment is harder than it sounds.
 
That's true but it's also why we have independent testing labs and licensing requirements. The question isn't whether manipulation is possible - it is, and some unregulated operators do it. The question is whether assuming it every time you lose reflects evidence or the bias.
 
honest answer mate? yeah i do it every time. then i sleep and it dissolves on its own. ive never once gone back and actually checked the evidence i thought i had the night before. not once
 
chapman said:
honest answer mate? yeah i do it every time. then i sleep and it dissolves on its own. ive never once gone back and actually checked the evidence i thought i had the night before. not once
Click to expand...
100% the urgency to prove i was wronged completely disappears with sleep. if i genuinely believed it was rigged id still believe it in the morning wouldnt i
 
the asymmetry is the tell. when you lose you investigate. when you win you just... accept it. never see anyone come to the forum saying "hit 400x last night, trying to understand what the casino did differently." the casino stays neutral in both outcomes. we assign all the meaning ourselves.
 
and the flip side of that is interesting too. when someone wins big they rarely credit luck either. they credit themselves. "read the variance right", "knew it was about to pay", "had a system". same bias, opposite direction. casino never gets credit for the good outcome and always gets blame for the bad one
 
theres also just the thing where i feel luckier on some sites than others. like genuinely do better at one place over time. i know on some level thats almost certainly how variance distributed across sessions. doesn't help. still feels like one site hates me specifically
 
Hey how do you actually know the difference between bad luck and the casino doing something wrong? Like is there a way to tell?!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top